Birth date: February 27, 1934
Home town: Winsted, Conn.
Family: Single
Religion: Christian
Education: Bachelors degree, Princeton University (1955); LLB, Harvard University (1958).
Political service: Ran for president in 1996.
Military service: Army Reserve, 1959.
Career: Consumer advocate and founder of Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), the Center for Auto Safety, Public Citizen, Center for Women's Policy Studies, Connecticut Citizen's Action Group, the Disability Rights Center, the Pension Rights Center and the Multinational Monitor magazine.

TODAY'S NEWS

IMCP: NADER'S HEALTH CARE SPEECH: WE CAN AFFORD UNIVERSAL COVERAGE 7/31
LVN: NADER SHOULD QUALIFY FOR PA BALLOT 7/31
SNE: 'ONE WAY OR THE OTHER, THERE WILL BE FOUR-WAY DEBATES'
DOCTOROW: CORPORATE MONEY IS THE DEATH OF THE CONSTITUTION 7/31
BDC: THE MAJORITY FAVOR OPEN DEBATES, THE TWO PARTIES DON'T 7/31
KUTTNER: NADER IS GETTING A BUM RAP 7/30
GOODMAN: IT MIGHT BE TIME TO TAKE A CHANCE ON NADER 7/30
NYT: DEM PARTY PLATFORM FIRMLY CENTRIST, NO COMMENT FROM BARNEY FRANK 7/30
AP: NADER RALLIES FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE 7/30
REUTERS: NADER UNITES CORPORATE CRITIQUE, HEALTH CARE CONCERNS 7/30
CBS: HEALTHCARE RALLY CROSSES GENERATIONAL, PARTY LINES 7/30
CNN: NADER: CORPORATE CORRUPTION OF POLITICS IS EXTREMIST, NOT THE GREENS 7/30
PROGRESSIVE: THE NYT GREEN-OUT ON NADER 7/30
WP: SHADOW CONVENTIONS OPEN IN PHILLY 7/30
CST: THE CONVENTIONS ARE AN INSULT TO HONEST WHORES EVERYWHERE 7/30
NYT: REFORM PARTY LIFTS ROCK, SHOVES BUCHANAN UNDER IT 7/30
MOJO: WHAT MAKES RALPH RUN? 7/29
WP: HOW TO HAVE DIVERSITY WITHOUT SPOILERS 7/29
AC: GREENS STRUGGLE WITH GA BALLOT ACCESS 7/29
WP: NADER TURNS IN SIGNATURES FOR MD BALLOT 7/29
SFE READER LETTERS: VOTING FOR WHAT YOU WANT IS NOT A WASTE 7/29
PRN: NADER TO DEMAND UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE IN PHILLY TODAY 7/29
AAS: WE NEED TO HEAR FROM THE PEOPLE, NOT THE TALKING HEADS 7/29
RNO: YOU CAN'T GET ANYTHING YOU WANT AT AL'S OR GEORGE'S OR RALPH'S RESTAURANT 7/29
BP: THE OTHER GREEN PARTY 7/27
DMT: NADER SHOULD MAKE THE MI BALLOT 7/27
NYN: HAS NADER CAMPAIGN SIGNED SAG-AFTRA PACT? 7/27
WSWS: NADER IS INSUFFICIENTLY SOCIALIST 7/27
LAT: NADER POLLING 7% IN NJ 7/27
NEWSWIRE: NADER GETS HEARING ON NC BALLOT ACCESS RESTRICTIONS 7/27
BG: NADER FORCES GORE TO TALK POPULIST 7/26
NADER: CLINTON ENERGY POLICY IS CORPORATE WELFARE FOR BIG OIL 7/26
HENTOFF: 'DEMOCRACY CAN'T BREATHE ON 15% OF THE AIR' 7/26
VV: DO YOU WANT TO RALPH?
RIDGEWAY: WORRIED ABOUT THE SUPREMES? DUMP CONGRESS 7/26
TP: DEMS COULD TAKE THE HOUSE ON NADER'S COATTAILS 7/26
TB ED: CRACK THE TWO-PARTY CONTROL OF DEBATES 7/26
CP: NADER'S BEEN TILTING AT TOO MANY WINDMILLS 7/26
OSUL: NADER ENGAGES COLLEGE STUDENTS 7/26
TP: GORE OR NADER: DO YOU VOTE YOUR FEARS OR YOUR HOPES? 7/26
TU READER LETTER: LET'S HEAR ALL THE TAXPAYER-FUNDED CANDIDATES DEBATE 7/26
DIONNE: THE POLITICS OF THE LIVING DEAD 7/25
COHEN: THE BUSINESS PRACTICES OF THE LIVING DEAD 7/25
SALON: THE VEEP OF THE LIVING DEAD, OR WHY THERE IS NO NADER NEWS 7/25
RMN: NADER AND LIVINGDEADSUCKS.COM 7/25
TB: NADER IS FROM CALIFORNIA AND OTHER STARTLING NEWS FROM THE LIVING DEAD 7/25
MUWAKKIL: RALPH'S THE ONLY ONE AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY 7/24
BG: NADER: 'FRANK IS A SURROGATE FOR SOMEONE WHO WON'T DEBATE ME' 7/24
SH: NADER ISN'T WISHY-WASHY 7/24
SH: ANOTHER REASON THE R'S AND D'S ARE AFRAID TO DEBATE NADER (4TH ITEM) 7/24
SALON: BUCHANAN CAMPAIGN FINDS COMMIES UNDER HAGELIN'S BED 7/24
AP: CORPORATE CRIME: THE DENTIST VS. THE DEFENSE CONTRACTORS 7/24
NYT: NADER WINNING OVER STEELWORKERS 7/23
KRUGMAN: NADER HAS WANDERED OFF THE RESERVATION 7/23
DOWD: ENLIVENING THE SHALLOW WITH THE SUPERFICIAL 7/23
WP: BUCHANAN LIFTS ROCK, WORMS CRAWL OUT 7/23
KUTTNER: GORE'S LATEST MAKEOVER PROVES NADER'S POINT 7/23
HE: NADER ATTRACTING DISAFFECTED IOWANS 7/23
DN: NADER SHOULD QUALIFY FOR MI BALLOT 7/23
CD: MEDIA GREEN-OUT FORCES NADER TO BARK 7/23
UWBH: NADER REACHING 9% IN WI 7/23
St.PT: NADER TESTIFIES FOR RESPONSIBLE PRESS 7/22
IC: VOTERS ARE TOO STUPID TO HANDLE A THREE-WAY DEBATE 7/22
IC: DEBATE COMMISSION DEALING FROM A STACKED DECK 7/22
DORGAN: GLOBALIZATION, CORPORATIONS, AND TAXES: WE'RE GETTING SCREWED 7/22
MOORE: NADER DOESN'T NEED GORE VOTES--HE HAS THE MAJORITY 7/20
MOORE: AIN'T FALLING FOR THE ABORTION THREAT AGAIN 7/20
ROCKEFELLER: REPUBLICANS FOR NADER? 7/20
BW: THERE'S ANOTHER AMERICA, AND RALPH SEES IT 7/20
BUELL: GORE'S ATTACK ON NADER WOULD BE MORE CREDIBLE IF HE OPENED THE DEBATE 7/20
COCKBURN: A VOTE FOR NADER IS A VOTE FOR OPTIMISM 7/20
ALTERNET: 'THE CORPORATE MEDIA IS SCARED SHITLESS BY NADER' 7/20
StPPP ED: LET NADER INTO THE DEBATES 7/19
NADER: STATE GOVERNORS, BROUGHT TO YOU BY CORPORATE CASH . . . 7/19
NYP: VEEPSTAKES: 'THE ONE THING WORSE THAN AN ISSUELESS ELECTION' 7/19
RIDGEWAY: IF YOU GIVE THEM A DIFFERENT CANDIDATE, THE DISAFFECTED WILL VOTE 7/19
UIDI: IS THERE A REASON FOR DEBATE EXCLUSION BESIDES SAVING GORE? 7/19
TOMPAINE.COM: SHOULD ENVIRONMENTALISTS GO WITH GREENS OR DEMS? 7/19
KAUL: CLASS WAR OVER, RICH GUYS WON 7/19
BARRY: BECAUSE IT MAKES AS MUCH SENSE AS 'REAL' PUNDITRY 7/19
AP: LABOR'S NADER SUPPORTERS IN A 'STUPOR' 7/18
BN: FOLLOW THE MONEY TRAIL ON THE CONVENTIONS 7/18
PR: NADER SPEAKS TO NATIONAL PRESS CLUB TODAY 7/18
IVINS: THE CORPORATIZATION OF CULTURE IS WORTH WORRYING ABOUT 7/18
NYT: GREEN CHALLENGER THREATENS ANOTHER POLITICAL SON 7/17
WP: ONCE AGAIN, NADER ASKED TO TALK ABOUT THE OTHER GUYS 7/17
OLIPHAUNT: GORE'S SOCIAL ISSUES TRUMP NADER'S ECONOMIC ISSUES 7/17
CSM: NADER PROPOSES 'DOT SUCKS' DOMAIN NAMES 7/17
AP: WILL CORPORATE PORK BE ON THE CONVENTION AGENDAS? 7/17
KUTTNER: WHO WILL TAKE ON THE LEGAL DRUG PROFITEERS? 7/17
"For short-term strategy, let's get Nader the 15 percent support in the polls that the Debate Commission says he needs to appear in the presidential debates. The point here is to move the debate. I am so sick of having to listen to Newt-Gingrich, Rush-Limbaugh Republicans and the Democrats who keep caving to them that I'll vote Nader in a New York minute. OK, that's because I live in Texas, where a vote for Nader is a "free vote." Our electors are going to Dubya no matter how Democrats here vote, so for us, this is the equivalent of a primary vote: Go with your heart. The same is true in states with the reverse situation. Massachusetts and New York will go Democratic no matter how the progressives vote; and if we can get Nader and the Green Party the 5 percent they need to qualify for federal spending in 2004, we will, in fact, move the debate. There's every reason to do it, and no reason not to." --Molly Ivins

MST: NADER: 'FOR 40 YEARS I HAVE WALKED THE WALK' 7/16
AP: NADER: 'NOBODY IS ENTITLED TO VOTES' 7/16
NYT: NADER'S BUY-AND-HOLD COMPARED TO LAWMAKERS' DAY-TRADING 7/16
NYT: 'DEATH TAX' PROPAGANDA SUCCESSFUL WITH THE PUBLIC 7/16
ST: LET THE PASSE PARANOIACS INTO THE DEBATE? 7/16
BG: GORE MAY NOT HAVE A LOCK ON CA 7/16
LAT: A SHORT HISTORY OF CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM 7/16
REICH: ONCE IN OFFICE, DEMS MOVE RIGHT 7/15
KUTTNER: THE DEAD CENTER OF AMERICAN POLITICS 7/15
SIUDE: NADER CHALLENGES IL BALLOT EXCLUSION 7/15
PI: WITHOUT GEPHARDT, RALPH EATS AL'S LUNCH 7/15
MJS: GORE PLAYS CHICKEN WITH NADER SUPPORTERS 7/15
BRODER: NONVOTERS ARE NOT, IT SEEMS, AN ALIEN SPECIES 7/15
StPPP: NADER MEETS WITH VENTURA 7/15
AP: NADER AND VENTURA TALK STRATEGY 7/15
MEANS: 'THE TWO-PARTY SYSTEM WORKS FINE' 7/15
LILEKS: MAKING MERRY WITH GREEN PLATFORM 7/15
OREGONIAN: LADUKE: TEACHER, DEBATER, ACTIVIST 7/15
HITCHENS: THE ARGUMENTS AGAINST NADER ARE BANKRUPT 7/14
POLLITT: ABORTION RIGHTS TRUMP THE REST OF IT 7/14
AP: NADER POLL NUMBERS UP 7/14
AP: MI NADER SUPPORTERS ASK GORE SOME TOUGH QUESTIONS 7/14
ROSE: THOUGHTS FROM THE SQUIRREL CAGE 7/14
SFE: GORE'S NADER IMITATION NOT VERY CONVINCING 7/14
LAW READER LETTERS: WE CAN'T GET ENOUGH NADER 7/14
NADER: FREE TRADE IN LANGUAGE EVEN THE NYT CAN UNDERSTAND 7/13
PFAFF: THE IDEOLOGY OF GLOBALISM 7/13
LAT: NADER HIRES WACKY MEDIA ADVISOR 7/13
COCKBURN: SHUT UP ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT, ALREADY 7/13
THE HILL: WELLSTONE OFFERS A FRIENDLY NON-ENDORSEMENT OF NADER 7/13
BP: HOW TO FIX THE DEBATE DEBACLE 7/13
DMT: NADER WANTS TO WAKE AMERICA UP 7/13
PC: THE CORRUPTION PERCEPTION INDEX 7/13
SLATE: A COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF VOTING FOR LOSERS 7/13
IVINS: YOUR HEART SAYS VOTE NADER 7/13
SALON: AN ACTUAL INTERVIEW WITH WINONA LADUKE 7/13
CSM: IS NADER'S CANDIDACY MORE THAN A FARCE? 7/13
LAT: GORE TRYING TO STEAL NADER'S MOVIE STARS 7/13
PSUDC: NADER RIPS GOVERNORS' MEETING 7/13
USAT READER LETTER: NADER ACTUALLY PAYS ATTENTION (3RD ITEM) 7/13
MILLER: THERE'S NO LEFT LEFT IN THE DEMS 7/12
PI ED: MISSILE DEFENSE TO BEAT THE BUSH 7/12
NICHOLS: GORE NEEDS TO RUN AS A REAL ALTERNATIVE TO BUSH 7/12
AP: NADER SIGNS ON WITH VENTURA'S AD FIRM 7/12
AP: NADER SPEAKS TO NAACP 7/12
TAP: NADER DIALOGUE CONTINUED 7/12
REUTERS: ANOTHER NADER-AS-THREAT-TO-GORE STORY 7/12
COCCO: BUSH-GORE TALKING ABOUT THE WRONG ISSUES 7/12
RC: NADER CALLS FOR CONGRESSIONAL VOTING DISCLOSURE REFORM 7/12
IJAZ: SOFT MONEY RACE PRICES IMMIGRANT VOICES OUT OF THE MARKET 7/12
SLATE: NADER REPLIES TO KAUS 7/11
CORN: 'THE BUSH-GORE CONTEST FOR HIGH SCHOOL PRESIDENT' 7/11
WELCH: 'NADER'S PLUCKY LITTLE CAMPAIGN' 7/11
NYT READER LETTER: NADER AND THE DEATH PENALTY 7/11
HINDU: COULD BRADLEY SAVE GORE FROM NADER? 7/11
IVINS: THE POLS AREN'T BARKING ABOUT WATER AND ENERGY 7/11
KLOH: NADER WANTS TO BAN COFFEE AND CARPETS (BUT NOT JOURNALISM STUDENTS) 7/11
WP: BOUGHT POLITICS I: GOP IGNORES FEC ON SPENDING LIMITS 7/10
WP: BOUGHT POLITICS II: CORPORATIONS IN, PUBLIC OUT OF GOVERNORS MEETING 7/10
CSM: BOUGHT POLITICS III: GIVING LEGISLATIVE CONTROL TO THE 'CAPTAINS OF CASH' 7/10
MUWAKKIL: 'EXTREME MODERATION' CREATES THIRD PARTY APPEAL 7/10
SJMN READER LETTERS: PRESS IS WACKY, NOT NADER 7/10
DMN: GREEN PARTY TAKING REFORM PLACE 7/10
IVINS: DO WE HAVE TO LOVE 'GLOBALIZATION'? 7/10
SALON: POLITICS = SCANDAL = TRIVIA 7/10
WP: SUPREMES: FOR EVERY SOUTER, THERE'S A WHITE 7/9
WP: TV STATIONS GETTING RICH OFF POLITICAL COMMERCIALS 7/9
LAT: GORE'S CLAIM TO FAME: HE'S NOT BUSH 7/9
ELY: OPEN DEBATES NOT FAIR TO THE VOTERS 7/9
ERBE: NADER RUNNING TO GET 'RICH AND FAMOUS' 7/9
NYP: CAN GEPHART VEEP SAVE AL FROM RALPH? 7/9
SSR: WINONA LADUKE, ECONOMIST, FARMER, ACTIVIST, MOM 7/9
IDS: IF INDIANA GOES TO BUSH, HOOSIER DEMS SHOULD VOTE NADER 7/9
WELCH: DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION TAKES HYPOCRISY TO NEW HEIGHTS 7/9
WATSON: WHY WON'T THE DEMS REFORM CORPORATE WELFARE? 7/8
DDN: NADER WON'T BE THE THIRTEENTH FACTOR 7/8
WP: NADER AT 8% IN MICHIGAN POLL 7/8
NYT: DEM PLATFORM DRAFT ENDORSES FREE TRADE 7/8
LEWIS: NADER'S INTERNATIONALISM NO DIFFERENT FROM BUCHANAN'S NATIONALISM 7/8
CT READER LETTERS: NADER AND BUCHANAN SHOULD BE IN DEBATES 7/8
CT READER LETTERS: A CURSORY READING OF NADER'S PLATFORM 7/8
SALON: SAME NADER QUOTES WE'VE BEEN HEARING FOR WEEKS (THIRD ITEM) 7/8
OD: IF BUSH HAS OK LOCKED UP, WHY NOT VOTE NADER? 7/8
IC: GORE AND BUSH MAY HAVE TO FACE TRADE ISSUES 7/7
SOLOMON: EDITORIAL WRITERS GO AFTER NADER 7/7
ACT FOR CHANGE: E-MAIL DEBATE COMMISSION FROM THIS PAGE 7/7
OHMAN: IF NADER WERE PRESIDENT . . . 7/7
CBS: NADER NEEDS TO BE NICER 7/7
PJ: RI GREENS: 'THE PARTY OF FDR HAS BEEN DEAD FOR DECADES' 7/7
PJ ED: 'NADER'S VIEWS REPRESENT THE OPINIONS OF MANY AMERICANS' 7/7
JACOBS: NADER SUPPORTERS ARE JUST SHALLOW, BUT THEY'LL GROW UP 7/7
SJMN READER LETTER: 'DON'T BLAME ME, I VOTED FOR NADER' 7/7
WP: GORE INSPIRES CENTRIST DEMOCRATIC PLATFORM 7/7
KRAUTHAMMER: BUCHANAN AND NADER IRRELEVANT FRINGE LEADERS 7/7
WP ED: BUCHANAN AND NADER ARE CHOICES, NOT SPOILERS 7/7
KAUS: GORE SHOULD ESTABLISH CENTRIST POSITION BY BASHING NADER 7/7
PINKERTON: US ELECTION SYSTEM PREVENTS COALITION POLITICS 7/7
DT: NADER ISN'T PLAYING CENTER FIELD 7/7

A VOTE FOR NADER'S A WASTED VOTE, RIGHT?

A great deal of what has been said about the Nader campaign recently boils down to the "don't waste your vote" school of thought: If Nader has no realistic chance of winning, why not vote for your second choice instead? The obvious answer from Nader supporters is that this just encourages the Duopoly Parties to think we're happy with their manufactured candidates, their fund-raising orgies, their constant compromise on important issues and their demagogic fixation on unimportant issues. This is Nader's famous "cold shower" argument: a protest vote is not a waste of time if it gets the message across.

Still, there are going to be folks who will argue that one must vote for Gore, even if it hurts worse than unanesthetized root canal work, because, well, there's the Sup reme Court. Someone might die or retire some day, and Gore might switch tactics all of a sudden and chose a truly desirable nominee, not just some bland soul who appeals to the cautious middle and is likely to be "electable" in the Senate confirmation hearings. (Hey--it could happen.) If Bush were elected, in contrast, it is clear that he would nominate some fire-breathing reactionary dead-set on cancelling the Bill of Rights, and of course the Senate would just roll over and confirm the dude. (Hey--it could happen.) Those of us who think it's better to elect legislators and executives who have the courage not to pass unconsitutional legislation in the first place, rather than getting so obsessed with appointing a Supreme Court who will save us from the excesses of our own legislature, will just shut up now. Nothing spoils a good cynical argument faster than changing the subject. Ask Ralph.

Of course, it's hard to know how a vote for Nader could be a waste of time in any state Bush or Gore is going to take anyway. Texans and Nebraskans, for instance, are unlikely to be in danger of seeing their state's electoral votes go to Gore even if no one votes for Nader. So a vote for Gore in these states doesn't benefit Gore any. However, a vote for Nader by those who can't stomach Bush would accomplish something at least for the next election season: at 5% of the vote, matching federal campaign funds for the Green party, and, at 15%, inclusion in the next debate cycle. Both of these things would help make the next election cycle less cynical and drab. In other words, it has been argued, if you have to throw your vote away, throw it away where it can do some good.

I have an even better suggestion, one we don't have to wait until November to start implementing. You only get one chance to throw your vote away, but it's quite possible you'll get dozens of chances between now and November to lie to the pollsters. Who cares whether you're really going to end up voting for Gore or Bush? Tell 'em you're going to vote Nader, come hell or high water. It is not actually illegal to lie to a pollster, and anyone who thinks it's immoral will, of course, be voting for Nader anyway, since that's such a touchingly "pu rist" attitude. By bringing Nader's poll numbers up to at least 15%, we force the debate commission to eat its words and let Nader into the fall debates. Also, we might get our polling-and-handicapping-obsessed friends in the media to delete their old boilerplate and start writing something interesting about Nader. This is one of those "pragmatic idealist" strategies that should strongly appeal to Gore supporters, and it's got enough "straight talk" in it for McCain Republicans. I can't see it upsetting anyone who understands the ballot rules in the Reform Party, either. Looks like a win-win-win-win to me.--Doris

DDN: NADER AND BUCHANAN DO NOT NEED TO STEP ASIDE 7/6
CHIDEYA: DEBATES AND THE VIABILITY CIRCLE 7/6
ROTHENBERG: NADER 'TOO EXTREME FOR MOST VOTERS' 7/6
NYT READER LETTERS: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GORE AND BUSH 7/6
NELSON: THE ISSUES THE DEMOCRATS AREN'T FACING 7/6
PRESS RELEASE: NATIONAL YOUTH CONVENTIONS 7/6
MF: NYT LOGIC: SHOULD GORE STEP ASIDE FOR NADER? 7/6
ANTIWAR.COM: DEBATING DEBATES AND NADER'S FOREIGN POLICY 7/6
ANDERSON: NADER IS A REFORMER, NOT A 'SPOILER' 7/5
NADER: 'DEATH' TAX IS A FAIRNESS TAX 7/5
PRESS RELEASE: NADER ON ARIZONA BALLOT 7/5
NYP: NYT'S UNDEMOCRATIC TRASHING OF NADER (LAST THIRD OF ITEM) 7/5
VV: GORE RECRUITS MOFFETT TO DEAL WITH THE NADER THREAT 7/5
KCS: NADER THE 'PERSUASIVE PROFESSOR' 7/5
HAZEN: NADER COULD TURN RACE UPSIDE DOWN 7/5
LAW: NADER AND POST-SEATTLE POLITICS 7/5
LAW: INTERVIEW WITH NADER 7/5
BP: NOT YOUR MOTHER'S GREEN PARTY 7/5
BUCKLEY: PUT PAT AND RALPH IN THE DEBATES 7/5
TNR: NADER 'TRIANGULATES' THE GREENS 7/5
IC: CAN NADER REACH THE NONVOTERS? 7/5
WSWS: WHY THE NYT WANTS NADER TO GO AWAY 7/4
CP: OHIO GREENS INTEND TO WIN 7/4
LAT READER LETTERS: WHERE'S YOUR NADER COVERAGE? 7/4
KINSLEY: 'JUST LIKE THE OTHER GUY, ONLY LESS SO' 7/4
DIONNE: NEGATIVE CAMPAIGNING V. TRIVIAL CAMPAIGNING 7/4
AP: VOTERS WANT SOME STRAIGHT TALK 7/4
COLLINS: 'HISTORY'S DROWNED KITTENS' 7/4
SLATE: NYT AND THE ART OF MANUFACTURED CYNICISM 7/4
TB: NADER: 'THE SAME UNABASHED LIBERAL HE'S ALWAYS BEEN' 7/3
AJ-C: NADER BUILDING A VIABLE THIRD PARTY 7/3
WP: THE GREENING OF CALIFORNIA POLITICS 7/3
WP: NO PEROT FOR THE REFORM PARTY 7/3
WP: TV MAKES THE BEST OF A BORING RACE 7/3
WP ED: HYPOCRISY OF CLINTON-GORE INSURANCE PROPOSAL 7/3
BG: THE SHADOW CONVENTIONS 7/3
JACKSON: 'THE PRICE OF CYNICAL POLITICS' 7/3
NJ: INSIDE THE SQUIRREL CAGE 7/3
PHILLIPS: PROSPECTS FOR A FOUR-WAY RACE 7/02
SFC READER LETTERS: NADER CAUGHT IN 'CATCH-22' 7/02
MCT: OPEN DEBATES TO OPEN DEMOCRACY 7/2
SLPD: NADER MAY HELP DEM HOUSE RACES 7/02
MST: NADER'S APPEAL BROADER THAN CONVENTIONAL WISDOM SUGGESTS 7/1
AP: NADER MOVES 'OUT OF THE FRINGE' 7/1
NYT: CA DEM PARTY ADVISER CALLS NADER 'A JOKE' 7/1

for previous nader headlines, go to...

Nader Watch is a non-advocacy site paid for and published by Politex, a non-affiliated U.S. citizen.
Edited by Doris.
(c) 2000. Permission of author required for reprinting.
Duration of working link not under our control.
Updated daily at various times.
Nader Watch has not reviewed all of the sites linked to our site and is not responsible
for the content of any off-site pages or any other sites linked to our site.
Your linking to any other off-site pages or other sites from our site
is at your own risk.